Front Cover.
When I compare my the standard of my preliminary task to the standard of my finished magazine I think that my skills with software have developed massively as the standard of my finished product is much higher than my preliminary. On my preliminary there is a limited colour scheme and there is no house style because everything is doesn't fit together. In my preliminary task I made a very silly mistake of not taking my own image from the front cover, this meant that the picture was taken landscape and not portrait. This caused major issues for me when I began editing the image and fitting it with the conventions of the magazine as getting the right A4 shape of a tradition magazine was very hard, especially without damaging the image. I used a simple image but because I didn't have the Photoshop skills that I developed during my Music magazine the cover of my preliminary did suffer. On my preliminary task the mast head and cover lines are boring, there is no real eye catching material on there, the image is a young male on a white background with red and black text in a plain font. On the front cover of music magazine I did used a plain background but I had an image that is challenges the conventions of most magazine photography because she has her back to camera and is looking over her shoulder, because I had developed my Photoshop skills while working on this magazine and I took all of the images myself the photography in this magazine is much better.
The masthead and cover lines for this magazine are much more interesting, yes I kept the red and black colour scheme but I chose fonts that created the house style that is present on my contents page and my double page spread. At the beginning of my preliminary I had very little knowledge on camera angles and lighting within the image and what would make a good image, that is why I didn't take the images myself. However by the time that I came to take the pictures I had two practice photo shots and used these to gain the correct lighting and to see what poses I wanted my model to use. I also has access to a high quality camera and this clearly shown in the photography. The preliminary task was useful to allow me to gain some experience in using the software, however I found that what the exam bored had asked me to do was definitive. They stated on the coursework information that it was to be a college/school magazine and they also gave you a recommendation on how the image for the front cover should be. However with my music magazine I found that I had a lot more freedom, I could select my own genre and decided on my choice of photography and mise en scene. The audience for the preliminary task was very broad, you were not just creating a magazine for the students. You were creating one for the parents and for the teachers, so the images had to be correct for all of those different opinions. In my music magazine I didn’t have to worry about this as much because I have created a magazine that only appeals to a specific audience.
Contents.
On my preliminary task I used the same text for the whole page to link the page together which looks quite boring. I also used minimal text on the contents with no description of anything and 3 images which don’t really link together and because I didn’t explain anything you have no idea which image goes with an article. However there is a lot of unused space and because of this it doesn’t look professional. My magazine contents page is a lot more professional because I used the space effectively and used smaller images and went into a little more depth in explaining things on the contents giving the reader more information, making it more effective and professional looking. In the preliminary task there isn’t really a house style as nothing really goes together, but on the music magazine the smaller images mixed with the gothic text and the colour scheme of black, white and red that creates the house style that my preliminary didn’t have. The development of my skills for programs like publisher really shows when you compare the two contents pages as one is laid out and looks professional because of the research that I did on contents pages. The photography used in both contents pages is completely different and this is one key thing that I have learnt. High quality photography is key to any published magazine and the reason that my preliminary didn’t look professional is because the lighting and the angles of the images was wrong and I had learnt how to correct this by the time I came to do the photography for my music magazine.

Double page spread.
As I didn't have to create a double page spread for my preliminary task I have nothing to compare my music magazine’s double page spread to. However I did continue with the house style that I developed on my front cover and the same colour scheme of black, white and red but on the article I used grey which works well and doesn't go away from the rock style that my magazine is in. The photography used for this is a massive improvement from what was used in my preliminary task. I did find that when I came to create my double page spread I didn't have any experience which made it a little harder. With the cover and the contents I have a rough idea as to my mistakes and had a rough idea on how to improve them. I took influences from the research I did on Kerrang and NME but I did make small mistakes that took a while to correct and this was due to lack of experience. This is one thing that I can criticise myself on, although I did to a lot of research I didn't look hard enough at the actual structure and content of the double page spread and because of this my article for my double page spread was week until I improved it and made it fit the idea of the character that I created
Areas of improvement and criticism.
During the process of making my music magazine I learnt various new skills with publisher and how to work to software effectively and use text, borders, resizing images and make the cover look of a better quality. I also learnt how to isolate pixels and edit them to improve the quality of the image its self, however I learnt that to do this you need a camera that captures each individual pixel rather than grouping them together. This is a skill that you really do need the right equipment for. I was also taught how to use photography lights, flashes, flash cables, backgrounds and zoom correctly as well as how to use the lighting effectively, correct camera angles and how important the positions and outfits are for the models.I have learned a lot about doing background research in an area before I do any kind of project. I learnt that it is important to know everything about the magazine industry and the conventions of music magazines before I went into my project otherwise I would of created a magazine that was completely wrong. I am aware that I could of done more research on double page spreads, but because I had also read a fair few music magazines I felt that I was very familiar with the layout and the usual content. My improvement on my Publisher and Photoshop skills is something that I will be able to use again. I am also very happy with the depth of the skills as I can use them for other media based products.
I think that I spent to much time on my front cover, I a lot of time trying to fill a large amount of space work, mainly above her head. I wasn't to keen on the idea of cropping and readjusting the size of the image because there is a possibility that it can change the clarity of your image, however in the end I did crop and change the size of the image but I did edit it on Photoshop to sharpen up the image.
My time management was a bit of, I found that I spend a lot of time trying to make smaller things work such as spacing on contents rather than analysing and ordering the information. The amount of time that I spent on the front cover is a lot, although in the end I did make it work, I learnt that a lot of space on a magazine cover doesn't always work and that the model needs to be the biggest image on there.
I have also learnt a lot about the current magazine industry and the ways of producing a magazine and how certain features can appeal to certain target audience and sub cultures more than others. I learnt this by contrasting and comparing certain magazines and their target audiences and what they have put in their magazine to create the mass fan based that these magazines have. I did not include certain things like a subscription and advertising a website. I also limited the content to just music as oppose to magazines like 'Rolling Stone' that include politics and reviews, by doing this I now realise that I did limit my target audience drastically as some people do like a mix of certain things in a magazine and I wouldn't of attracted this subculture and this could be a criticism.
